Thus revealed, the creature buried its nose in the tire-tilled soil...
September 26, 2006
Body odor will be exterminated!
Category: Linkage

MORE DALEKS

I couldn't resist. An official shower gel-filled Dalek will be mine!

In other news, Bill Clinton freaking rocks, as the folks at Sore Thumbs have aptly summed up in this comic. He's f**king Bill Clinton, fool.

-posted by Wes | 6:59 pm | Comments (8)
September 24, 2006
DALEKMANIAAAAA!!!

I watched New York Minute last night. Oh my god. OH MY GOD. The latest Crayon Haiku says it all, and see the attendant SC blog entry for a mini- review of the film. Oh my god.

Dr. Who and the DALEKS

In other news, my Dr. Who DVD box set finally arrived yesterday! So far I've watched Dr. Who and the Daleks, which isn't terribly interesting or exciting despite the presence of everyone's favorite salt shaker-shaped cyborgs. Part of the problem stems from the fact that it's adapted from and adheres far too closely to the second "Doctor Who" serial (which itself was fairly boring, the introduction of the Daleks notwithstanding), so there's nothing new here except the draw of seeing Daleks in color. I guess that alone made the movie worth seeing back in the 60s, but considering that one can not only see Daleks in color but see them in color and molesting naked women the thrill is all but gone at this point. I do like Peter Cushing, though, and the lengthy text bio of him in the DVD extras was a rather nifty read.

However, because the film does have Daleks, I now have an excuse to finally add images of them to my random DVD screencap script. Hurrah!

DALEKS!DALEKS!
DALEKS!DALEKS!
DALEKS!DALEKS!
DALEKS!DALEKS!

I added a bunch of others as well... click the following link (or just scroll down if you've already done so) to see 'em. See if you can guess what DVDs I snagged them from! Some are pretty easy; some are not. (more...)

-posted by Wes | 8:56 pm | Comments (4)
September 22, 2006
Because I said I would...!
Category: Art

Okay, here are drawings of two people that I promised to draw like over a year ago and have just now completed. See if you can guess who they are just by looking at the pictures without looking at the image titles! Running your cursor over the images and looking at the status bar (or clicking the images and reading the filenames) will let you know if you're right. Click the display picture(s) below for the larger and/or undithered images.

The Shake Shack is in the background.

I'd like to say that I hope it was worth the wait, but there's no way that it could be because being drawn all goofy-like by me is in no way an exciting or memorable or life-changing experience. Still, in a feeble attempt to try and make up for the delay, I've also created individual pics with some additional details that will hopefully amuse today's models: (more...)

-posted by Wes | 8:27 pm | Comments (6)
September 21, 2006
Geek chic is superficial
Category: Miscellany

Another lengthy comment response to one of TAB's posts that became an entry of its own, though this one is significantly shorter:

I disagree with this post -- it's not actual geeks that people regard as being sexy. It's just the look, which arguably has more to do with the rise of emo culture among teens and geekish metrosexual styles among adults than professional success in IT fields (et cetera).

Artists and eccentric actors and offbeat comedians have sex appeal, sure, but these guys aren't true geeks. Note that the truest form of geekery is hardly creative, because the geeks are generally too busy worshipping at the altar of something else to make their own contributions. It's possible to be geek-y without being a geek (and nerd-y without being a nerd, et cetera).

By the way, speaking of geeks and their interest in comic books, I saw something at Best Buy today that I thought was rather neat -- all of the issues of the Ultimate X-Men comic on a single CD-ROM for $10. Given that most of the people who buy comics probably don't even actually read them and that the people most interested in reading them probably wouldn't even want to buy them, the Internet has made it far too easy for folks to simply download titles every month, but releases like this may prove an effective alternative. True, people generally don't want to pay for what they can get for free, but $10 for 70+ issues is a damn good deal -- and one that comic fans could enjoy without feeling like they were cheating an industry that they love. Hell, if I were into the Ultimate X-Men comic (I am totally not), I'd have picked it up without hesitation. Well, there might be some hesitation -- the files are apparently in PDF format, and I generally hate Acrobat. The CDisplay Comic Reader is a much more pleasant program to work with.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.

-posted by Wes | 8:38 pm | Comments (3)
September 20, 2006
Doctor Who Series 2: Comments and criticisms

Be careful not to sneeze...

I'd intended to write about the 2006 series of Doctor Who a while ago -- apparently since early July, given the creation date of the above image! -- but the Dalek madness took hold of me and I'm just now getting around to it in response to yesterday's review from TAB. I began writing the following remarks as a comment on his post, but then figured I might as well use the above image and post them here.

I agree with TAB that Series 2 was better than Series 1, but only because its somewhat lighter tone and Eccleston's slightly more emotive portrayal didn't make the Doctor seem so much like an asshole when people started dying. Even though the words themselves rang sort of hollow, the way David Tennant solemnly intoned, "I'm sorry, I'm so sorry," upon encountering human corpses at least shows that his Doctor acknowledges the deaths of others, whereas Chris Eccleston actively and recklessly contributed to their demise and then bounced around all giddy like on more than one occasion. (By contrast, he was visibly upset when a hotwired pig was killed.) It's hard to say who was the better Doctor, since it's almost like comparing two different characters. I found Tennant's Doctor to be more appealing, but again that probably has more to do with the tone of the Series 2 episodes than either actor's skill in the role. Eccleston is probably the better actor overall, though.

In retrospect, however, it's kind of odd that I like Series 2 better, seeing as how it had some exceedingly stupid episodes. In fact, looking over the list, I only really liked about half of the thirteen eps: "School Reunion", "The Girl in the Fireplace" (my favorite of the season; almost reminded me of the Douglas Adams serials of old), the "Rise of the Cybermen/The Age of Steel" two-parter, and the two-part "Army of Ghosts/Doomsday" finale. The other eps were mostly just bland, but then there were a few with outright terrible shark-jumping plotlines. (more...)

-posted by Wes | 7:54 pm | Comments (6)