Thus revealed, the creature buried its nose in the tire-tilled soil...
September 20, 2006
Doctor Who Series 2: Comments and criticisms

Be careful not to sneeze...

I'd intended to write about the 2006 series of Doctor Who a while ago -- apparently since early July, given the creation date of the above image! -- but the Dalek madness took hold of me and I'm just now getting around to it in response to yesterday's review from TAB. I began writing the following remarks as a comment on his post, but then figured I might as well use the above image and post them here.

I agree with TAB that Series 2 was better than Series 1, but only because its somewhat lighter tone and Eccleston's slightly more emotive portrayal didn't make the Doctor seem so much like an asshole when people started dying. Even though the words themselves rang sort of hollow, the way David Tennant solemnly intoned, "I'm sorry, I'm so sorry," upon encountering human corpses at least shows that his Doctor acknowledges the deaths of others, whereas Chris Eccleston actively and recklessly contributed to their demise and then bounced around all giddy like on more than one occasion. (By contrast, he was visibly upset when a hotwired pig was killed.) It's hard to say who was the better Doctor, since it's almost like comparing two different characters. I found Tennant's Doctor to be more appealing, but again that probably has more to do with the tone of the Series 2 episodes than either actor's skill in the role. Eccleston is probably the better actor overall, though.

In retrospect, however, it's kind of odd that I like Series 2 better, seeing as how it had some exceedingly stupid episodes. In fact, looking over the list, I only really liked about half of the thirteen eps: "School Reunion", "The Girl in the Fireplace" (my favorite of the season; almost reminded me of the Douglas Adams serials of old), the "Rise of the Cybermen/The Age of Steel" two-parter, and the two-part "Army of Ghosts/Doomsday" finale. The other eps were mostly just bland, but then there were a few with outright terrible shark-jumping plotlines.

For example, in one two-part serial that borrowed extensively from Event Horizon, the Doctor killed Satan. Another episode ended with him taking up the torch and lighting the Olympic Flame at the 2012 London Olympic games. And all throughout the developments and characters went out of their way to praise the Doctor, which got kind of irritating after a while. Yes, he's the titular character of the show, and he's always been portrayed as a more/less noble sort of fellow, but the show never went to such great lengths to insist upon his greatness before. I mean really, killing Satan? Bleh. There were also abundant references to "Torchwood", the upcoming spinoff series, which oftentimes made the show seem like an elaborate commercial. It was frequent enough to get pretty irritating, but it might make for a good drinking game if one were to host a Series 2 marathon.

Also, TAB writes, "...and when Rose finally departed the series at the end, for the first time ever on the program, the Doctor shed tears. Perhaps as he gets older and exposed to the race, the character becomes more human?" On the contrary (and barring the possibility that the Doctor is, in fact, half-human on his mother's side), I think it has more to do with the writers being way too melodramatic. That tearful goodbye scene lasted far too long and wasn't terribly moving considering the number of companions the Doctor has had and will continue to have in the future. TAB mentions Elizabeth Sladen's return to the show as Sarah Jane Smith -- and while their reunion on the show was neat (Sladen looks fantastic for her age), recall that the Doctor nonchalantly dropped her off on a street corner without so much as a second glance. Hell, he left his own granddaughter stranded on a post-apocalyptic Earth with a love interest that she had met only several days earlier!

So the way Rose went on boo-hooing about how great he is and how he has to travel the universe alone? Rubbish. The case for him being a perpetual loner makes sense, given the perspective and distance that his 900+ years would give him, but he's never physically alone for very long. It's also worth noting that the Doctor could theoretically visit any of his old companions any time he wants, seeing as how he's got a freaking time machine at his disposal! I can understand the writers trying to inject some emotion into the departure of a major cast member -- admittedly, the way previous companions just sort of walked off without so much as a hug or a handshake seemed kind of odd -- but I don't think they succeeded.

Other gripes: Rose. Billie Piper is sort of attractive, but Rose was mostly useless. To be fair, so was Sarah Jane and a bunch of the Doctor's other companions, but still. The Doctor needs to find better companions. What ever happened to tough girls like Leela and Ace?

But the worst thing about Series 2? There were not nearly enough Dalek appearances. Dalek Sec had better be in like every episode of Series 3. The Dalek empire must survive!

-posted by Wes | 7:54 pm | Comments (6)
6 Comments »
  • dave says:

    Daleks? But the Doctor destroyed the Daleks! We're all doomed!!!!!! If the daleks can make a return appearance, how about the Time Lords?

    Wes, you're missing one thing. The doctor has never blantaly had a crush on one of his companions. Remember episode one where he was using two fingers to rub that dial on the console back and forth while asking rose if she was excited yet? (This was after he was pumoing a long shaft in and out of the console, asking if she was excited yet). She used to have that bra strap showing. The doctor was a threatened alpha monkey whenever mickey came by. He quickly threw that young guy from the first dalek episode out of the tardis, presumably because he left himself a time changing message, but that can't be the reason, considering he brought Rose back to witness her father's death and kept her on after she fucked up the entire time space continuium. He was a jealous schoolboy when Captian Jack hit the scene. That was all new behavior for the doctor towards his companions, so it's not entirely out o.f nowhere that he was emotional

  • Wes says:

    I dunno -- I'd argue that at the end of the day it was Rose who was jealous of Jack, not the Doctor! And he was all over his "companion" in the TV movie, but that was kinda lame. Which is what the Doctor's so-called crush on Rose would be! There's also the argument that he was far more obviously romantically interested in another character during Series 2, even if he did sort of have a thing for Rose.

    Anyway, you'll have to see the scene in question (assuming you haven't seen it already) -- it just goes on and on and when it was over I didn't so much want to cry as sigh in relief because it was fiiiinally over. I'd have to say Rose was far more into the Doctor than he ever was into her, though. 'Cause the way Rose apparently defined herself by her relationship with the Doctor? Ugh.

    I wouldn't mind the return of Romana or the Master, but other than them the Time Lords are sort of boring IMHO.

  • Lori says:

    I've never seen an episode of Dr. Who any series any where any companion. Personally it doesn't sound like I'm missing much. And don't say that I don't appreciate British humor, because that is patently not true.

  • Wes says:

    Well, while there are some humorous moments, Dr. Who isn't a comedy show! But while I wouldn't say you should totally avoid the new series, I will say that if you dislike modern science fiction shows you probably won't get into it. The older serials had this slow, almost tame aura to them that, coupled with low production values, gave the show a sort of interesting charm (think of it as being sort of like those British mysteries that air on PBS, but with a science fiction angle). But these new episodes, with their fancy special effects and snappy dialogue and quick-fix plotlines, just seem like derivative standard SciFi Channel fare to me. Which isn't to say that they're entirely devoid of merit -- nothing with Daleks can be entirely devoid of merit -- but still.

  • T.A.B. says:

    Wes, after reading this, I'm convinced you could find the down side to world peace.

  • Wes says:

    Note that it is not very difficult to posit a downside to world peace! Consider that a world filled with zombies would be relatively peaceful -- if anything, it would be the survivors shooting zombies in the head causing all of the violence. But certainly there are problems with that world! For an example with which you are familiar, though, I refer you to the reign of Jasmine during the latter part of "Angel" Season 4. Peaceful, yes... BUT SHE ATE PEOPLE!!!

Leave a Reply...