Seriously -- inquiring minds want to know. This latest audio post is like three and a half minutes, but the tone isn't quite as irate as the last one. It was kind of irritating to see, but I was more confused and weirded out than anything else.

No, really -- I went down my blogroll and read at least the latest entry in every blog and in most cases the last two or three. I commented where I had something to say. In some cases, I wrote quite a lot. Thanks to Sam, I also learned about yeti crabs, which are totally awesome. Aren't you proud of me? I knew you would be. By the way, does anyone know what has happened to Parizad? My link appears to be dead. :/

Okay, later.

...that I was at an amusement park and one of the attractions was this live action Superman show starring Winona Ryder as Lois Lane. I wanted to go talk to her after the show, but earlier my pants had gotten wet in the water park and I didn't want her to think I'd wet myself, so I kept my distance for the time being. I woke up before they finished drying.

Oh, and here's a question for you -- before today, did the GO button for the archives selector to the right fall down to the next line on your display? It didn't on my desktop, but it did on the laptop, which doesn't make a ton of sense seeing as how I'm using the same browser and the same version of that browser over here, but eh. Anyway, I fixed that because it annoyed me.

But not as much as not getting to chat with Winona Ryder.

That's "Entertainment Tonight", not Spielberg's little alien. I love that guy.

Anyway, the audio file is here. It's nothing over-the-top or excessive, but there is some bad language in this 1:19 post, so you know what not to do if that kind of thing offends you. When I started recording I was planning to go on to discuss the way that people's preoccupation with celebrities causes them to ignore and neglect other important things in their lives (yesterday I noted that although my mother goes to church on Sundays, she spends her entire week going on and on and on and on about Oprah and other such bullshit), but then I got kinda frustrated and decided to cut it short. I feel like making things explode.

All for now -- ja ne, minna-san.

So at the request of TAB, I watched the new "Doctor Who" show on the SciFi Channel last night. I look forward to reading his review of the new show -- I'm curious about how it compares to the old version -- but I can't say I found anything to be terribly interesting about these eps. I suspect that the show's appeal for a lot of people will be based upon its connection to the old show and the simple fact that it is science fiction, but when I get into scifi -- or anime, or horror, or anything really -- it's not just for the sake of the genre, but for more the more substantial stuff. I really dug the neat alternate Earths to which they traveled in "Sliders", for example, but that would've meant diddly without complex, likable characters and a pleasant group dynamic. Buffy worked not only because of the interesting life metaphors presented in her battles with the undead, but also, again, because of likable characters and the group dynamic (until the latter two seasons, which is one of the reasons that they pretty much sucked). People have recently expressed surprise at my affection for the earlier seasons of "Dawson's Creek" -- but given that it was largely founded upon (again!) likable characters and the group dynamic, it's really not all that shocking. Same deal with "Teen Titans", Ninja Turtles, X-Men (at least in the comics and the cartoons; the lack of these elements in the live action movies is one reason that they've been such disappointments), etc., etc. Hell, in addition to the batshit insanity, the interplay between characters was even central to the appeal of "Pee-wee's Playhouse" .

Anyway, with the new Dr. Who, you get a goofy dude making Pee-wee faces and a displaced girl with a connection to each other that is shallow at best (yeah, I know, first episodes and all, but even the depiction of the bonding efforts between the two was extremely superficial) and situations that aren't terribly different from stuff I've seen before. Mindless mannequins might as well be zombies (and next week's episode actually features zombies, so whoop-dee-doo), and processions of wacky aliens making passing references to current pop culture is pretty standard fare even in popular scifi. Maybe "Battlestar Galactica" deals with "deep, philosophical questions" (I kinda doubt that, and seeing as how it would cost me in the neighborhood of $40 to find out I doubt that I will anytime soon...), but this Dr. Who seems like pure conceptiovisual geekery. Which is to say that people will simply get off on the wacky visuals and the idea of this guy traveling to alternate universes, because that's pretty much all the show has going for it thus far. Maybe things will change as the series progresses, but these initial episodes lead me to doubt it.

Speaking of things I doubt, following the parenthetical link in the first paragraph (or just clicking here) will take you to an article in which I explain why I doubt that X3 will be worth watching at all. Scary-Crayon has been plugged. All for now -- ja ne, minna-san!

Man, I'd forgotten how much I liked this show. It's kinda weird watching it without the commercials, though -- I keep expecting the dancing frog or Nikki Cox to pop out and say something about tonight's sponsors. When DVD-9 discs become the norm, I think they should start making television series DVDs with commercials which, like commentary and subtitles, can be activated via a submenu. Not only would they considerably ramp up the nostalgia factor -- especially if they could get current advertisers to provide their old spots for older shows -- but the advertising revenues could allow companies to sell DVD box sets at significantly lower prices. Why hasn't anyone thought to do this? It's a total win-win.

Does anybody remember that South Park episode when Cartman went back to colonial times and beat that messenger boy to death with a 2x4 while singing the Dawson's Creek theme song? Why the hell was that so funny? I crack up every time I think about it.

And for those of you who've enjoyed our culinary experiments over at Scary-Crayon, there's a new sandwich in town. It's legendary.

It now appears to me that it is a speck of dust/lint somehow trapped underneath the screen's protective covering, judging from its position relative to the angle at which I view it (as opposed to the fixed position of the pixels on the screen image itself). There must be a way to rectify this matter, but short of cracking open the lid I am at a loss for answers. Outsourced tech support, I imagine, will be of little assistance.